↓ Skip to main content

Health care financing and the sustainability of health systems

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal for Equity in Health, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
368 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health care financing and the sustainability of health systems
Published in
International Journal for Equity in Health, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12939-015-0208-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lycourgos Liaropoulos, Ilias Goranitis

Abstract

The economic crisis brought an unprecedented attention to the issue of health system sustainability in the developed world. The discussion, however, has been mainly limited to "traditional" issues of cost-effectiveness, quality of care, and, lately, patient involvement. Not enough attention has yet been paid to the issue of who pays and, more importantly, to the sustainability of financing. This fundamental concept in the economics of health policy needs to be reconsidered carefully. In a globalized economy, as the share of labor decreases relative to that of capital, wage income is increasingly insufficient to cover the rising cost of care. At the same time, as the cost of Social Health Insurance through employment contributions rises with medical costs, it imperils the competitiveness of the economy. These reasons explain why spreading health care cost to all factors of production through comprehensive National Health Insurance financed by progressive taxation of income from all sources, instead of employer-employee contributions, protects health system objectives, especially during economic recessions, and ensures health system sustainability.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 368 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 365 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 75 20%
Researcher 36 10%
Student > Bachelor 35 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 6%
Other 59 16%
Unknown 111 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 89 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 45 12%
Social Sciences 26 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 22 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 22 6%
Other 43 12%
Unknown 121 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,434,805
of 25,547,324 outputs
Outputs from International Journal for Equity in Health
#396
of 2,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,712
of 281,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal for Equity in Health
#6
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,547,324 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,250 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.