You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
"I'm on it 24/7 at the moment": A qualitative examination of multi-screen viewing behaviours among UK 10-11 year olds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-8-85 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Russell Jago, Simon J Sebire, Trish Gorely, Itziar Hoyos Cillero, Stuart JH Biddle |
| Abstract |
Screen-viewing has been associated with increased body mass, increased risk of metabolic syndrome and lower psychological well-being among children and adolescents. There is a shortage of information about the nature of contemporary screen-viewing amongst children especially given the rapid advances in screen-viewing equipment technology and their widespread availability. Anecdotal evidence suggests that large numbers of children embrace the multi-functionality of current devices to engage in multiple forms of screen-viewing at the same time. In this paper we used qualitative methods to assess the nature and extent of multiple forms of screen-viewing in UK children. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 160 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Researcher | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 32 | 19% |
| Unknown | 42 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 32 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 25 | 15% |
| Unknown | 55 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2017.
All research outputs
#3,025,995
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,007
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,816
of 130,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#11
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.