↓ Skip to main content

Effects of probiotics on child growth: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 622)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effects of probiotics on child growth: a systematic review
Published in
Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition, May 2015
DOI 10.1186/s41043-015-0010-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ojochenemi J Onubi, Amudha S Poobalan, Brendan Dineen, Debbi Marais, Geraldine McNeill

Abstract

Child undernutrition has short and long term consequence for both individuals and society. Previous studies show probiotics may promote child growth and have an impact on under-nutrition. A systematic review of the literature was carried out on three electronic databases to assess evidence. The outcome measured was change in weight or height. A narrative analysis was conducted due to heterogeneity of included studies. Twelve studies were included in the review of which ten were randomised controlled trials. A total of 2757 children were included, with 1598 from developing countries. The studies varied in type and quantity of probiotics given, duration of interventions, characteristics of participants, setting and units of outcome measures. Overall, five studies found a positive effect of probiotics on child growth. All five were conducted in developing countries with four studies conducted in mostly under-nourished children and one in well-nourished children. No significant effect on growth was found in the seven studies that were conducted in developed countries. The limited evidence suggests that probiotics have the potential to improve child growth in developing countries and in under-nourished children. More research is needed to explore this further.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 209 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 19%
Student > Bachelor 22 10%
Researcher 14 7%
Student > Postgraduate 12 6%
Other 11 5%
Other 41 20%
Unknown 71 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 5%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 82 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2021.
All research outputs
#2,314,839
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
#48
of 622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,048
of 278,962 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 622 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,962 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them