↓ Skip to main content

Social support in the general population: standardization of the Oslo social support scale (OSSS-3)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
343 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
527 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social support in the general population: standardization of the Oslo social support scale (OSSS-3)
Published in
BMC Psychology, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s40359-018-0249-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rüya-Daniela Kocalevent, Lorenz Berg, Manfred E. Beutel, Andreas Hinz, Markus Zenger, Martin Härter, Urs Nater, Elmar Brähler

Abstract

The objectives of the study were to generate normative data for the Oslo Social Support Scale (OSSS-3) for different age groups for men and women and to further investigate the factor structure in the general population. Nationally representative face-to face household surveys were conducted in Germany in 2008 (n = 2524). Normative data for the Oslo Social Support Scale were generated for men and women (52.3% female) and different age levels (mean age (SD) of 48.9 (18.3) years). Men had mean scores comparable to women (10.1 [SD = 2.3] vs. 10.2 [SD = 2.2]). The EFA resulted in a clear one-factor solution for the OSSS-3. The normative data provide a framework for the interpretation and comparisons of social support with other populations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 527 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 527 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 8%
Student > Bachelor 38 7%
Researcher 35 7%
Lecturer 23 4%
Other 89 17%
Unknown 255 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 64 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 59 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 53 10%
Social Sciences 22 4%
Neuroscience 9 2%
Other 51 10%
Unknown 269 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,246,843
of 25,076,138 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychology
#161
of 1,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,886
of 302,057 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychology
#7
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,076,138 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,057 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.