↓ Skip to main content

Biological monitoring of pesticide exposures in residents living near agricultural land

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biological monitoring of pesticide exposures in residents living near agricultural land
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-11-856
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen S Galea, Laura MacCalman, Kate Jones, John Cocker, Paul Teedon, Anne J Sleeuwenhoek, John W Cherrie, Martie van Tongeren

Abstract

There is currently a lack of reliable information on the exposures of residents and bystanders to pesticides in the UK. Previous research has shown that the methods currently used for assessing pesticide exposure for regulatory purposes are appropriate for farm workers 1. However, there were indications that the exposures of bystanders may sometimes be underestimated. The previous study did not collect data for residents. Therefore, this study aims to collect measurements to determine if the current methods and tools are appropriate for assessing pesticide exposure for residents living near agricultural fields.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
El Salvador 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 49 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 21%
Other 6 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 11 21%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 9 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,128,457
of 24,378,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,413
of 16,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,812
of 146,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#23
of 203 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,378,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 203 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.