↓ Skip to main content

The interest of gait markers in the identification of subgroups among fibromyalgia patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The interest of gait markers in the identification of subgroups among fibromyalgia patients
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-12-258
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard Auvinet, Denis Chaleil, Jean Cabane, Anne Dumolard, Pierre Hatron, Robert Juvin, Michel Lanteri-Minet, Yves Mainguy, Laurence Negre-Pages, Fabien Pillard, Daniel Riviere, Yves-Michel Maugars

Abstract

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a heterogeneous syndrome and its classification into subgroups calls for broad-based discussion. FM subgrouping, which aims to adapt treatment according to different subgroups, relies in part, on psychological and cognitive dysfunctions. Since motor control of gait is closely related to cognitive function, we hypothesized that gait markers could be of interest in the identification of FM patients' subgroups. This controlled study aimed at characterizing gait disorders in FM, and subgrouping FM patients according to gait markers such as stride frequency (SF), stride regularity (SR), and cranio-caudal power (CCP) which measures kinesia.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 102 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 12%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 27 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 26%
Psychology 14 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Engineering 5 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 4%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 33 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2011.
All research outputs
#13,357,126
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,897
of 4,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,459
of 142,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#38
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.