↓ Skip to main content

Progress testing in the medical curriculum: students’ approaches to learning and perceived stress

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Progress testing in the medical curriculum: students’ approaches to learning and perceived stress
Published in
BMC Medical Education, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12909-015-0426-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yan Chen, Marcus Henning, Jill Yielder, Rhys Jones, Andy Wearn, Jennifer Weller

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 143 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Master 11 7%
Lecturer 10 7%
Researcher 9 6%
Other 41 28%
Unknown 43 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 30%
Social Sciences 16 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Psychology 11 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 43 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2015.
All research outputs
#7,127,223
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,196
of 4,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,847
of 283,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#23
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,046 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.