Title |
Guided chemotherapy based on patient‐derived mini‐xenograft models improves survival of gallbladder carcinoma patients
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Communications, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40880-018-0318-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ming Zhan, Rui-meng Yang, Hui Wang, Min He, Wei Chen, Sun-wang Xu, Lin-hua Yang, Qiang Liu, Man-mei Long, Jian Wang |
Abstract |
Gallbladder carcinoma is highly aggressive and resistant to chemotherapy, with no consistent strategy to guide first line chemotherapy. However, patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model has been increasingly used as an effective model for in preclinical study of chemosensitivity. Mini-PDX model was established using freshly resected primary lesions from 12 patients with gallbladder to examine the sensitivity with five of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents, namely gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil, nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab)-paclitaxel, and irinotecan. The results were used to guide the selection of chemotherapeutic agents for adjunctive treatment after the surgery. Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) with 45 patients who received conventional chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin. Cell viability assays based on mini-PDX model revealed significant heterogeneities in drug responsiveness. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients in the PDX-guided chemotherapy group had significantly longer median OS (18.6 months; 95% CI 15.9-21.3 months) than patients in the conventional chemotherapy group (13.9 months; 95% CI 11.7-16.2 months) (P = 0.030; HR 3.18; 95% CI 1.47-6.91). Patients in the PDX-guided chemotherapy group also had significantly longer median DFS (17.6 months; 95% CI 14.5-20.6 months) than patients in the conventional chemotherapy group (12.0 months; 95% CI 9.7-14.4 months) (P = 0.014; HR 3.37; 95% CI 1.67-6.79). The use of mini-PDX model to guide selection of chemotherapeutic regimens could improve the outcome in patients with gallbladder carcinoma. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Brazil | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
Professor | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 6 | 19% |
Unknown | 13 | 42% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 16% |
Unknown | 14 | 45% |