You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Deregressed EBV as the response variable yield more reliable genomic predictions than traditional EBV in pure-bred pigs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics Selection Evolution, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1297-9686-43-38 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tage Ostersen, Ole F Christensen, Mark Henryon, Bjarne Nielsen, Guosheng Su, Per Madsen |
| Abstract |
Genomic selection can be implemented by a multi-step procedure, which requires a response variable and a statistical method. For pure-bred pigs, it was hypothesised that deregressed estimated breeding values (EBV) with the parent average removed as the response variable generate higher reliabilities of genomic breeding values than EBV, and that the normal, thick-tailed and mixture-distribution models yield similar reliabilities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 29% |
| Researcher | 24 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 94 | 75% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 1 | <1% |
| Computer Science | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 17 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,960,512
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#271
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,230
of 155,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them