You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tyrosinemia type 1: a rare and forgotten cause of reversible hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in infancy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, September 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-6-362 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarar Mohamed, Mohammed A Kambal, Nasir A Al Jurayyan, Abdulrahman Al-Nemri, Amir Babiker, Rana Hasanato, Abdullah S Al-Jarallah |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Unknown | 18 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 11% |
| Psychology | 5 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 20 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2015.
All research outputs
#7,467,331
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,239
of 4,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,530
of 198,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#18
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.