You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Effectiveness of a structured motivational intervention including smoking cessation advice and spirometry information in the primary care setting: the ESPITAP study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-859 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Francisco Martin-Lujan, Josep Ll Piñol-Moreso, Nuria Martin-Vergara, Josep Basora-Gallisa, Irene Pascual-Palacios, Ramon Sagarra-Alamo, Estefania Aparicio Llopis, Maria T Basora-Gallisa, Roser Pedret-Llaberia, the ESPITAP Study Group investigators |
Abstract |
There is current controversy about the efficacy of smoking cessation interventions that are based on information obtained by spirometry. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness in the primary care setting of structured motivational intervention to achieve smoking cessation, compared with usual clinical practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 5% |
Spain | 2 | 2% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 91 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
Researcher | 10 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
Other | 23 | 23% |
Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 11% |
Psychology | 7 | 7% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 4% |
Other | 16 | 16% |
Unknown | 25 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2011.
All research outputs
#20,150,151
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,783
of 14,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#130,313
of 142,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#191
of 198 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,737 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 198 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.