↓ Skip to main content

Preferential use of Siglec-1 or Siglec-10 by type 1 and type 2 PRRSV strains to infect PK15S1–CD163 and PK15S10–CD163 cells

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preferential use of Siglec-1 or Siglec-10 by type 1 and type 2 PRRSV strains to infect PK15S1–CD163 and PK15S10–CD163 cells
Published in
Veterinary Research, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13567-018-0569-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiexiong Xie, Isaura Christiaens, Bo Yang, Ivan Trus, Bert Devriendt, Tingting Cui, Ruifang Wei, Hans J. Nauwynck

Abstract

Cellular entry mediators define whether the cell is permissive to PRRSV infection. Porcine sialoadhesin (pSn, Siglec-1) and CD163 are main entry mediators facilitating infection of porcine macrophages by PRRSV. Recently, Siglec-10 was demonstrated to be an alternative receptor for PRRSV. To examine if virulence and pathogenicity of PRRSV strains could be correlated with the use of different Siglecs, a PK15 cell line recombinantly expressing Siglec-1 and CD163 (PK15S1-CD163) and a PK15 cell line recombinantly expressing Siglec-10 and CD163 (PK15S10-CD163) were used to compare the virus replication of 7 genotype 1 subtype 1 strains (G1s1), 2 genotype 1 subtype 3 (G1s3) strains and 5 genotype 2 (G2) strains. Some strains (08VA (G1s1), 13V117 (G1s1), 17V035 (G1s1), VR2332 (G2)) were poor virus producers (<104 TCID50/mL), while other strains (07V063 (G1s1), 13V091 (G1s1), Su1-Bel (G1s3), MN-184 (G2), Korea17 (G2) and SDSU-73 (G2)) easily grew up to ≥106 TCID50/mL. PK15S10-CD163 cells exhibited a higher efficiency in virus production per infected cell than the PK15S1-CD163 cells. The G1s1 strains LV and 07V063 infected more cells in the PK15S1-CD163, whereas the 94V360 and 08VA strains preferred PK15S10-CD163. The highly virulent G1s3 strains Lena and Su1-Bel showed a strong preference for PK15S1-CD163. The G2 strains MN-184, SDSU-73, Korea17 had a much higher infection rate in PK15S10-CD163, while the reference strain VR2332 and the NADC30 strain had a slight preference for PK15S1-CD163. Differences in receptor use may influence the outcome of a PRRSV infection in pigs and explain in part the virulence/pathogenicity of PRRSV strains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 23%
Researcher 3 14%
Other 2 9%
Professor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 9 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,266,724
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Research
#405
of 1,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,315
of 340,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Research
#19
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.