↓ Skip to main content

A retrospective study of head and neck re-irradiation for patients with recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer: the McGill University experience

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A retrospective study of head and neck re-irradiation for patients with recurrent or second primary head and neck cancer: the McGill University experience
Published in
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40463-015-0084-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rolina Al-Wassia, Siavosh Vakilian, Crystal Holly, Khalil Sultanem, George Shenouda

Abstract

We report our experience with patients who received re-irradiation to the head and neck area for locoregional recurrences (LRR) or second primaries (SP) in a previously irradiated field. We reviewed 27 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of LRR or SP head and neck carcinoma treated with a second course of radiotherapy between April 2004 and July 2012. The main outcome measures were local control, overall survival, and complications. The results are expressed as actuarial values using the Kaplan-Meier estimates. The median follow-up time was 24.7 months (range: 11 days-79.3 months). There were 23 males and four females with a median age of 61 years (range: 40-87 years). The actuarial overall survival rates at 1, 2, and 5 years were 77, 59, and 57 %, respectively. The actuarial local control rate was 80, 52, and 52 % at 1, 2, and 5 years, respectively. Three patients developed systemic metastases. The rate of grade 3 toxicity was 26 %, and that of grade 4 toxicity was 3 %. There were two treatment-related deaths (grade 5 toxicity). Continuous course re-irradiation in patients with LRR or SP head and neck cancer is feasible with acceptable toxicity. With current encouraging rates of local control and overall survival, this option should be discussed with patients who have few alternative therapeutic options.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 8 15%
Other 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 13 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 21 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2015.
All research outputs
#8,563,146
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
#129
of 629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,007
of 277,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them