↓ Skip to main content

What stops children with a chronic illness accessing health care: a mixed methods study in children with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
What stops children with a chronic illness accessing health care: a mixed methods study in children with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME)
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-11-308
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carly M Webb, Simon M Collin, Toity Deave, Andrew Haig-Ferguson, Amy Spatz, Esther Crawley

Abstract

Paediatric Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) is relatively common and disabling with a mean time out of school of more than one academic year. NICE guidelines recommend referral to specialist services immediately if severely affected, within 3 months if moderately affected and within 6 months if mildly affected. However, the median time-to-assessment by a specialist service in the UK is 18 months. This study used a mixed-methods approach to examine factors associated with time taken to access specialist services.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Unknown 82 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 16 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 19%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 17 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,818,373
of 23,937,746 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#641
of 8,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,058
of 144,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#8
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,937,746 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.