↓ Skip to main content

Pattern and predictors of immunologic recovery in HIV infected patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pattern and predictors of immunologic recovery in HIV infected patients
Published in
BMC Research Notes, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1406-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Theophilus B. Kwofie, Michael Owusu, Mohamed Mutocheluh, Samuel Blay Nguah, Joseph Obeng-Baah, Charlotte Hanson, Albert Dompreh

Abstract

Although anti-retroviral therapy has generally improved the survival of HIV infected patients in many developing countries including Ghana, specific socio-demographic factors could still influence outcome of treatment. This study was designed to identify patient-specific factors that could influence the immune recovery of absolute CD4 count in HIV infected patients. Hospital records were extracted from two health facilities in Ghana. The impact of socio-demographic factors type of ART and baseline category of CD4 counts were assessed at six monthly interval using robust linear mixed models. A total of 214 follow up records were reviewed at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital (KATH) and the Kumasi South Hospital (KSH). One hundred (46.7 %) were from KATH and 114 (53.3 %) were from KSH. There was a general increase in the level of CD4 counts with time, however this increase significantly slowed down with subsequent reviews (p < 0.001). On the average the rate of CD4 count recovery slowed down by 43.6 cells/µl for every 6 months of follow up (SE = 7.69; p < 0.001). Similarly the recovery of CD4 counts in subjects with an initial high baseline CD4 counts decreased by 192.6 cells/µl (SD error = 42.3, p value ≤0.001). All other variables were not significantly associated with recovery of CD4 counts. Our study has demonstrated the well-known phenomenon of CD4 counts increasing after administration of ARTs. CD4 counts increased more rapidly in those with relatively lower initial counts, catching up with those with high CD4 count by 2 years post treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 21%
Student > Master 6 15%
Lecturer 4 10%
Other 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 8 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 9 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2015.
All research outputs
#17,773,420
of 22,828,180 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,829
of 4,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#180,040
of 267,010 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#104
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,828,180 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,264 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,010 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.