↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pregnant women: cross-sectional analysis of physiological parameters throughout pregnancy and the impact of the supine position

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,386)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
28 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative cardiovascular magnetic resonance in pregnant women: cross-sectional analysis of physiological parameters throughout pregnancy and the impact of the supine position
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2011
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-13-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexia Rossi, Jerome Cornette, Mark R Johnson, Yusuf Karamermer, Tirza Springeling, Petra Opic, Adriaan Moelker, Gabriel P Krestin, Eric Steegers, Jolien Roos-Hesselink, Robert-Jan M van Geuns

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 2 3%
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Postgraduate 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Other 8 10%
Other 20 25%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 51%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Engineering 2 3%
Neuroscience 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 20 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 204. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2022.
All research outputs
#195,050
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#6
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#625
of 128,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them