↓ Skip to main content

Integrating genetics and epigenetics in breast cancer: biological insights, experimental, computational methods and therapeutic potential

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Integrating genetics and epigenetics in breast cancer: biological insights, experimental, computational methods and therapeutic potential
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12918-015-0211-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Cava, Gloria Bertoli, Isabella Castiglioni

Abstract

Development of human cancer can proceed through the accumulation of different genetic changes affecting the structure and function of the genome. Combined analyses of molecular data at multiple levels, such as DNA copy-number alteration, mRNA and miRNA expression, can clarify biological functions and pathways deregulated in cancer. The integrative methods that are used to investigate these data involve different fields, including biology, bioinformatics, and statistics. These methodologies are presented in this review, and their implementation in breast cancer is discussed with a focus on integration strategies. We report current applications, recent studies and interesting results leading to the identification of candidate biomarkers for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy in breast cancer by using both individual and combined analyses. This review presents a state of art of the role of different technologies in breast cancer based on the integration of genetics and epigenetics, and shares some issues related to the new opportunities and challenges offered by the application of such integrative approaches.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Norway 1 1%
Unknown 96 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 22%
Student > Master 19 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Other 6 6%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 12%
Computer Science 4 4%
Psychology 3 3%
Other 14 14%
Unknown 16 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2015.
All research outputs
#13,956,297
of 22,829,083 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#518
of 1,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,725
of 274,256 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,256 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.