You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation outcome for influenza-associated acute respiratory failure in Japan between 2009 and 2016
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-018-0306-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shinichiro Ohshimo, Nobuaki Shime, Satoshi Nakagawa, Osamu Nishida, Shinhiro Takeda, Committee of the Japan ECMO project |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 2 | 50% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 17% |
Researcher | 6 | 17% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 46% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 9% |
Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2018.
All research outputs
#14,718,998
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#370
of 528 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,849
of 327,693 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 528 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,693 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.