↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a minimal psychological intervention to reduce non-severe depression in chronically ill elderly patients: the design of a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN9233…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, June 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
249 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a minimal psychological intervention to reduce non-severe depression in chronically ill elderly patients: the design of a randomised controlled trial [ISRCTN92331982]
Published in
BMC Public Health, June 2006
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-6-161
Pubmed ID
Authors

F Lamers, CCM Jonkers, H Bosma, JPM Diederiks, JThM van Eijk

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 249 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 241 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 18%
Student > Master 42 17%
Researcher 31 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 6%
Student > Bachelor 14 6%
Other 51 20%
Unknown 52 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 22%
Psychology 50 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 15%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 2%
Other 26 10%
Unknown 67 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2015.
All research outputs
#19,834,129
of 24,373,273 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#13,914
of 16,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,160
of 66,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#28
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,373,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 66,283 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.