↓ Skip to main content

How does roadside vegetation management affect the diversity of vascular plants and invertebrates? A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 336)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
71 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How does roadside vegetation management affect the diversity of vascular plants and invertebrates? A systematic review
Published in
Environmental Evidence, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13750-018-0129-z
Authors

Simon Jakobsson, Claes Bernes, James M. Bullock, Kris Verheyen, Regina Lindborg

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 120 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 23%
Researcher 19 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Other 8 7%
Other 11 9%
Unknown 32 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 31%
Environmental Science 33 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Philosophy 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 40 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2023.
All research outputs
#833,666
of 25,874,560 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#22
of 336 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,374
of 342,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,874,560 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 336 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them