↓ Skip to main content

Clinical profile of patients with ATP1A3 mutations in Alternating Hemiplegia of Childhood—a study of 155 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
123 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical profile of patients with ATP1A3 mutations in Alternating Hemiplegia of Childhood—a study of 155 patients
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13023-015-0335-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eleni Panagiotakaki, Elisa De Grandis, Michela Stagnaro, Erin L. Heinzen, Carmen Fons, Sanjay Sisodiya, Boukje de Vries, Christophe Goubau, Sarah Weckhuysen, David Kemlink, Ingrid Scheffer, Gaëtan Lesca, Muriel Rabilloud, Amna Klich, Alia Ramirez-Camacho, Adriana Ulate-Campos, Jaume Campistol, Melania Giannotta, Marie-Laure Moutard, Diane Doummar, Cecile Hubsch-Bonneaud, Fatima Jaffer, Helen Cross, Fiorella Gurrieri, Danilo Tiziano, Sona Nevsimalova, Sophie Nicole, Brian Neville, Arn M. J. M. van den Maagdenberg, Mohamad Mikati, David B. Goldstein, Rosaria Vavassori, Alexis Arzimanoglou, The Italian IBAHC Consortium, The French AHC Consortium, The International AHC Consortium

Abstract

Mutations in the gene ATP1A3 have recently been identified to be prevalent in patients with alternating hemiplegia of childhood (AHC2). Based on a large series of patients with AHC, we set out to identify the spectrum of different mutations within the ATP1A3 gene and further establish any correlation with phenotype. Clinical data from an international cohort of 155 AHC patients (84 females, 71 males; between 3 months and 52 years) were gathered using a specifically formulated questionnaire and analysed relative to the mutational ATP1A3 gene data for each patient. In total, 34 different ATP1A3 mutations were detected in 85 % (132/155) patients, seven of which were novel. In general, mutations were found to cluster into five different regions. The most frequent mutations included: p.Asp801Asn (43 %; 57/132), p.Glu815Lys (16 %; 22/132), and p.Gly947Arg (11 %; 15/132). Of these, p.Glu815Lys was associated with a severe phenotype, with more severe intellectual and motor disability. p.Asp801Asn appeared to confer a milder phenotypic expression, and p.Gly947Arg appeared to correlate with the most favourable prognosis, compared to the other two frequent mutations. Overall, the comparison of the clinical profiles suggested a gradient of severity between the three major mutations with differences in intellectual (p = 0.029) and motor (p = 0.039) disabilities being statistically significant. For patients with epilepsy, age at onset of seizures was earlier for patients with either p.Glu815Lys or p.Gly947Arg mutation, compared to those with p.Asp801Asn mutation (p < 0.001). With regards to the five mutation clusters, some clusters appeared to correlate with certain clinical phenotypes. No statistically significant clinical correlations were found between patients with and without ATP1A3 mutations. Our results, demonstrate a highly variable clinical phenotype in patients with AHC2 that correlates with certain mutations and possibly clusters within the ATP1A3 gene. Our description of the clinical profile of patients with the most frequent mutations and the clinical picture of those with less common mutations confirms the results from previous studies, and further expands the spectrum of genotype-phenotype correlations. Our results may be useful to confirm diagnosis and may influence decisions to ensure appropriate early medical intervention in patients with AHC. They provide a stronger basis for the constitution of more homogeneous groups to be included in clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 2 2%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 12%
Other 10 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Student > Postgraduate 8 9%
Other 25 27%
Unknown 19 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 24%
Neuroscience 15 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 4%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 27 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,392,838
of 24,937,289 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#589
of 3,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,952
of 280,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#12
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,937,289 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,001 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.