You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Does quality of care for hypertension in primary care vary with postcode area deprivation? An observational study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, November 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-11-297 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Salah Hammouche, Richard Holland, Nicholas Steel |
Abstract |
Hypertension is a common major risk factor for stroke and coronary heart disease. Little is known about how achievement of financially incentivised and non-incentivised indicators of quality of care varies with deprivation, or about the effect of financial incentives on health inequalities in hypertension. General practices in the UK have received financial incentives for high quality care since 2004. This study set out to assess the variations in achievement of incentivised and non-incentivised quality indicators for hypertension by patient area deprivation, before and after the introduction of financial incentives. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 83 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 14% |
Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Other | 18 | 21% |
Unknown | 23 | 27% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 8% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 7% |
Unspecified | 4 | 5% |
Other | 15 | 17% |
Unknown | 24 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2011.
All research outputs
#18,300,116
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#6,425
of 7,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,511
of 141,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#85
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.