↓ Skip to main content

Association between brain-derived neurotrophic factor and von Willebrand factor levels in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, February 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Association between brain-derived neurotrophic factor and von Willebrand factor levels in patients with stable coronary artery disease
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, February 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12872-018-0762-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hong Jin, Yifei Chen, Bilei Wang, Yi Zhu, Long Chen, Xiqiong Han, Genshan Ma, Naifeng Liu

Abstract

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a neurotrophin involved in angiogenesis and maintenance of endothelial integrity. Whether circulating BDNF levels are associated with von Willebrand factor (vWF) levels, which are indicators of endothelial dysfunction is not known. This study investigated the association between plasma BNDF and vWF levels and whether these biomarkers could predict cardiovascular events at a 12-month follow-up in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). We recruited 234 patients with suspected angina pectoris. Subjects were divided into CAD (n = 143) and control (n = 91) groups based on coronary angiography. Plasma BDNF and vWF levels were measured using ELISA. Patients were followed-up for one year, and information on adverse cardiac events was collected. CAD patients exhibited significantly lower plasma BDNF and higher vWF levels than those of control patients. High vWF levels were associated with low BDNF levels even after adjustment for age, gender, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) levels, and the presence of diabetes mellitus. A receiver operating characteristic curve was used to determine whether low BDNF and high vWF levels could predict adverse cardiovascular events. The area under the curve for vWF and the inverse of BDNF were 0.774 and 0.804, respectively. These findings suggest that endothelial dysfunction is an important determinant of the impaired circulating BDNF levels, and they further reflected cardiovascular prognosis in stable CAD patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Other 3 8%
Student > Master 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 14 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 11%
Neuroscience 4 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 15 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#20,527,576
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#1,349
of 1,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#375,722
of 437,648 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#22
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,648 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,648 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.