↓ Skip to main content

Drug utilization in neonatal setting of Pakistan: focus on unlicensed and off label drug prescribing

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Drug utilization in neonatal setting of Pakistan: focus on unlicensed and off label drug prescribing
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, July 2018
DOI 10.1186/s12887-018-1211-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Aamir, Jamshaid Ali Khan, Faisal Shakeel, Rabeea Shareef, Nazia Shah

Abstract

Unlicensed and off label drug use is an issue recognized worldwide in pediatric pharmacotherapy. The study was designed to assess the prevalence and predictors of unlicensed and off label drug use in neonatal population of Pakistan. A prospective, observation study was conducted in nursery units at pediatric department of four tertiary care hospitals during the 1 year. Micromedex DRUGDEX was used to evaluate the case notes of 1300 patients. Logistic regression was employed to calculate the odds ratio for the predictors of unlicensed and off label drug use. A total of 1300 patients were included in this study who were treated with 52 different drugs. The prevalence of off label drug use was higher (52.14%) as compared to unlicensed drug use (33.35%). Dose (61.29%) and indication (13.68%) were the most frequent reasons for off label prescribing. In comparison to the corresponding reference categories, females and preterm infants were less likely to receive unlicensed prescriptions. While patients staying at hospital more than 5 days and infants receiving 3 or more medications were significantly more likely to receive unlicensed prescriptions. Moreover, in comparison to the corresponding reference categories, females were less likely to receive off label prescriptions while infants receiving 3 or more medications were 7 times more likely to receive off label prescriptions. The significant prevalence of unlicensed and off label drug prescriptions was found in neonatal population of Pakistan. The findings imply that more data on prevalence of unlicensed and off label prescriptions are required to provide a better picture of pediatric therapy in developing countries. Furthermore, advance formulations with new dosing in pediatrics is also necessary to minimize the risk of adverse drug events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 17%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Lecturer 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 25 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 28 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,540,879
of 23,096,849 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,072
of 3,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,957
of 330,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#68
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,096,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.