You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tanzanian lessons in using non-physician clinicians to scale up comprehensive emergency obstetric care in remote and rural areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Human Resources for Health, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1478-4491-9-28 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angelo S Nyamtema, Senga K Pemba, Godfrey Mbaruku, Fulgence D Rutasha, Jos van Roosmalen |
| Abstract |
With 15-30% met need for comprehensive emergency obstetrical care (CEmOC) and a 3% caesarean section rate, Tanzania needs to expand the number of facilities providing these services in more remote areas. Considering severe shortage of human resources for health in the country, currently operating at 32% of the required skilled workforce, an intensive three-month course was developed to train non-physician clinicians for remote health centres. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 31 | 20% |
| Researcher | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 20% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 76 | 48% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2015.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Human Resources for Health
#702
of 1,261 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,121
of 155,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Resources for Health
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,261 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.