↓ Skip to main content

Developing a community-based genetic nomenclature for anole lizards

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing a community-based genetic nomenclature for anole lizards
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-12-554
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenro Kusumi, Rob J Kulathinal, Arhat Abzhanov, Stephane Boissinot, Nicholas G Crawford, Brant C Faircloth, Travis C Glenn, Daniel E Janes, Jonathan B Losos, Douglas B Menke, Steven Poe, Thomas J Sanger, Christopher J Schneider, Jessica Stapley, Juli Wade, Jeanne Wilson-Rawls

Abstract

Comparative studies of amniotes have been hindered by a dearth of reptilian molecular sequences. With the genomic assembly of the green anole, Anolis carolinensis available, non-avian reptilian genes can now be compared to mammalian, avian, and amphibian homologs. Furthermore, with more than 350 extant species in the genus Anolis, anoles are an unparalleled example of tetrapod genetic diversity and divergence. As an important ecological, genetic and now genomic reference, it is imperative to develop a standardized Anolis gene nomenclature alongside associated vocabularies and other useful metrics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Researcher 7 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 14%
Professor 6 12%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Computer Science 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2016.
All research outputs
#4,524,391
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,896
of 10,607 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,009
of 142,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#17
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,607 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.