↓ Skip to main content

Effect of dietary defatted diatom biomass on egg production and quality of laying hens

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of dietary defatted diatom biomass on egg production and quality of laying hens
Published in
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/2049-1891-5-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiangjun Leng, Kun-Nan Hsu, Richard E Austic, Xin’ gen Lei

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 47 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Chemical Engineering 3 6%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Engineering 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 11 22%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2015.
All research outputs
#10,044,425
of 12,554,960 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#217
of 273 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,649
of 246,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,554,960 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 273 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them