You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Implications of sampling design and sample size for national carbon accounting systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Carbon Balance and Management, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-0680-6-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Köhl, Andrew Lister, Charles T Scott, Thomas Baldauf, Daniel Plugge |
| Abstract |
Countries willing to adopt a REDD regime need to establish a national Measurement, Reporting and Verification (MRV) system that provides information on forest carbon stocks and carbon stock changes. Due to the extensive areas covered by forests the information is generally obtained by sample based surveys. Most operational sampling approaches utilize a combination of earth-observation data and in-situ field assessments as data sources. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| Ghana | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 50 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 13% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2011.
All research outputs
#15,238,442
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#170
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,072
of 142,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#7
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.