You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Circulating concentration of markers of angiogenic activity in patients with sarcoidosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12890-015-0110-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dariusz Ziora, Dariusz Jastrzębski, Mariusz Adamek, Zenon Czuba, Jerzy Kozielski J., Alicja Grzanka, Alicja Kasperska-Zajac |
| Abstract |
Angiogenesis is an important process involved in the pathogenesis of diffuse parenchymal lung diseases. The aim of the study was to compare the angiogenic profile of patients with sarcoidosis and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) based on analysis of circulating factors. Serum concentrations of angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), follistatin, granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF), interleukin-8 (IL-8), platelet derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), platelet endothelial cellular adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) and vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGF) were measured in the patients and the healthy subjects. Serum concentrations of G-CSF, follistatin, PECAM-1 and IL-8 were significantly higher in the IPF patients in comparison with the control group and the sarcoid patients. PDGF-BB concentrations were also significantly higher in serum of IPF patients than in sarcoid patients, but not than in the controls. In contrast, Ang-2 and VEGF concentrations did not differ significantly between the three groups. In the sarcoid patients, irrespective of the disease activity or the radiological stage, serum concentrations of these cytokines were similar to the control group. These results indicate that differences may exist in angiogenic activity between patients with parenchymal lung diseases. In contrast to sarcoidosis, IPF is characterized by a higher serum concentration of different molecules involved in the angiogenic processes . |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 19% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 29% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2016.
All research outputs
#17,774,664
of 22,829,683 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#1,257
of 1,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,979
of 277,499 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#24
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,829,683 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,499 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.