↓ Skip to main content

Preconception care for diabetic women for improving maternal and fetal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
286 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preconception care for diabetic women for improving maternal and fetal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, October 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-10-63
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hayfaa A Wahabi, Rasmeia A Alzeidan, Ghada A Bawazeer, Lubna A Alansari, Samia A Esmaeil

Abstract

Preexisting diabetes mellitus is associated with increased risk for maternal and fetal adverse outcomes. Despite improvement in the access and quality of antenatal care recent population based studies demonstrating increased congenital abnormalities and perinatal mortality in diabetic mothers as compared to the background population. This systematic review was carried out to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of preconception care in improving maternal and fetal outcomes for women with preexisting diabetes mellitus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 286 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 278 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 52 18%
Researcher 32 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 10%
Student > Bachelor 29 10%
Student > Postgraduate 24 8%
Other 55 19%
Unknown 65 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 118 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 34 12%
Social Sciences 14 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 76 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,952,607
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,085
of 4,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,469
of 98,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,149 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.