You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Reverse triggering induced by endotracheal tube leak in lightly sedated ARDS patient
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Intensive Care, July 2018
|
DOI | 10.1186/s40560-018-0314-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Taiga Itagaki, Yoshitoyo Ueno, Nobuto Nakanishi, Jun Oto |
Abstract |
Reverse triggering is respiratory entrainment triggered by the ventilator especially seen among heavily sedated patients. We confirmed reverse triggering induced by auto-triggering in lightly sedated patient through an esophageal pressure monitoring. The reverse triggering frequently caused breath stacking with increased tidal volume. Physicians should be aware, even at an optimal level of sedation, that reverse triggering can develop, possibly caused by auto-triggering. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 3 | 25% |
Spain | 2 | 17% |
Ecuador | 1 | 8% |
Argentina | 1 | 8% |
Unknown | 5 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 29% |
Other | 4 | 29% |
Researcher | 2 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 57% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 14% |
Unspecified | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,367,278
of 25,374,374 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#253
of 576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,138
of 337,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#11
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,374 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,027 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.