↓ Skip to main content

Development of a validated patient-reported symptom metric for pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis: qualitative methods

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development of a validated patient-reported symptom metric for pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis: qualitative methods
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-230x-11-126
Pubmed ID
Authors

James P Franciosi, Kevin A Hommel, Charles W DeBrosse, Allison B Greenberg, Alexandria J Greenler, J Pablo Abonia, Marc E Rothenberg, James W Varni

Abstract

Previous attempts to measure symptoms in pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE) have not fully included patients and parents in the item development process. We sought to identify and validate key patient self-reported and parent proxy-reported outcomes (PROs) specific to EoE.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Unknown 78 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 9 11%
Other 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 7 9%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 56%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2011.
All research outputs
#13,659,672
of 22,656,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#655
of 1,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,268
of 238,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#13
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,656,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,720 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.