You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Opinion versus practice regarding the use of rehabilitation services in home care: an investigation using machine learning algorithms
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, October 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12911-015-0203-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lu Cheng, Mu Zhu, Jeffrey W. Poss, John P. Hirdes, Christine Glenny, Paul Stolee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
India | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 75% |
Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 49 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
Librarian | 3 | 6% |
Other | 13 | 26% |
Unknown | 17 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 12% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 8% |
Computer Science | 2 | 4% |
Mathematics | 2 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 18% |
Unknown | 20 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2015.
All research outputs
#15,258,829
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#993
of 2,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,565
of 294,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#17
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,447 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.