↓ Skip to main content

A trial for the use of qigong in the treatment of pre and mild essential hypertension: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A trial for the use of qigong in the treatment of pre and mild essential hypertension: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-12-244
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ji-Eun Park, Yan Liu, Taeseob Park, Sanghoon Hong, Jung-Eun Kim, Tae-Hun Kim, Ae-Ran Kim, So-Young Jung, Hyoju Park, Sun-Mi Choi

Abstract

Hypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and the prevalence of hypertension tends to increase with age. Current treatments for hypertension have side effects and poor adherence. Qigong has been studied as an alternative therapy for hypertension; however, the types of qigong used in those studies were diverse, and there have not been many well-designed randomized controlled trials.Our objectives are the following: 1) To evaluate the effects of qigong on blood pressure, health status and hormone levels for pre- or mild hypertension. 2) To test the methodological appropriateness of this clinical trial and calculate a sample size for future randomized trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 11%
Researcher 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 8%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 24 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 13%
Sports and Recreations 6 7%
Psychology 4 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 27 32%