↓ Skip to main content

Utility of clinical parameters to identify HIV infection in infants below ten weeks of age in South Africa: a prospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Utility of clinical parameters to identify HIV infection in infants below ten weeks of age in South Africa: a prospective cohort study
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-11-104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Heather B Jaspan, Landon Myer, Shabir A Madhi, Avy Violari, Diana M Gibb, Wendy S Stevens, Els Dobbels, Mark F Cotton

Abstract

As HIV-infected infants have high mortality, the World Health Organization now recommends initiating antiretroviral therapy as early as possible in the first year of life. However, in many settings, laboratory diagnosis of HIV in infants is not readily available. We aimed to develop a clinical algorithm for HIV presumptive diagnosis in infants < 10 weeks old using screening data from the Children with HIV Early Antiretroviral therapy (CHER) study in South Africa.HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected exposed infants < 10 weeks of age were identified through Vertical Transmission Prevention programs. Clinical and laboratory data were systematically recorded, groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Fisher's exact tests. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves were compiled using combinations of clinical findings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Ethiopia 1 1%
Unknown 76 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 23%
Student > Master 16 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 13 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 8%
Social Sciences 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 12 15%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2011.
All research outputs
#3,032,604
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#461
of 2,972 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,704
of 239,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#8
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,972 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.