↓ Skip to main content

Xanthorrhizol: a review of its pharmacological activities and anticancer properties

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Cell International, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
359 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Xanthorrhizol: a review of its pharmacological activities and anticancer properties
Published in
Cancer Cell International, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12935-015-0255-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seok Fang Oon, Meenakshii Nallappan, Thiam Tsui Tee, Shamarina Shohaimi, Nur Kartinee Kassim, Mohd Shazrul Fazry Sa’ariwijaya, Yew Hoong Cheah

Abstract

Xanthorrhizol (XNT) is a bisabolane-type sesquiterpenoid compound extracted from Curcuma xanthorrhiza Roxb. It has been well established to possess a variety of biological activities such as anticancer, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, antihyperglycemic, antihypertensive, antiplatelet, nephroprotective, hepatoprotective, estrogenic and anti-estrogenic effects. Since many synthetic drugs possess toxic side effects and are unable to support the increasing prevalence of disease, there is significant interest in developing natural product as new therapeutics. XNT is a very potent natural bioactive compound that could fulfil the current need for new drug discovery. Despite its importance, a comprehensive review of XNT's pharmacological activities has not been published in the scientific literature to date. Here, the present review aims to summarize the available information in this area, focus on its anticancer properties and indicate the current status of the research. This helps to facilitate the understanding of XNT's pharmacological role in drug discovery, thus suggesting areas where further research is required.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 359 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 356 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 91 25%
Student > Master 31 9%
Researcher 21 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 5%
Lecturer 15 4%
Other 31 9%
Unknown 153 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 58 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 44 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 6%
Chemistry 21 6%
Other 34 9%
Unknown 155 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,604,906
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Cell International
#895
of 2,245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,156
of 294,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Cell International
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,245 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.