↓ Skip to main content

How do external factors contribute to the hypocoagulative state in trauma-induced coagulopathy? – In vitro analysis of the lethal triad in trauma

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How do external factors contribute to the hypocoagulative state in trauma-induced coagulopathy? – In vitro analysis of the lethal triad in trauma
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13049-018-0536-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Caspers, Nadine Schäfer, Matthias Fröhlich, Ursula Bauerfeind, Bertil Bouillon, Manuel Mutschler, Marc Maegele

Abstract

External factors following trauma and iatrogenic intervention influence blood coagulation and particularly clot formation. In particular, three external factors (in detail dilution via uncritical volume replacement, acidosis and hypothermia), in combination, referred to as the "lethal triad", substantially aggravate the hypocoagulative state after trauma. Contribution of these external factors to the resulting hypocoagulative state in trauma and especially their influence on primary haemostasis has still not been investigated systematically. This study aims to assess this contribution to the aggravating hypocoagulative state in trauma-induced coagulopathy (TIC) using an in vitro simulation assay. Emphasis is given to platelet contribution to clot formation and to the investigation of how platelet activation alters under the respective conditions. To simulate the conditions of lethal triad in vitro, whole blood samples taken from five healthy volunteers were introduced to the respective conditions. Besides standard coagulation testing, thrombelastometric analysis and differentiated platelet mapping were performed. All three simulated conditions induced significant impairments of clot formation (clot formation time, CFT; α -angle) and propagation (maximum clot firmness, MCF; Diameter A5-A25), with the highest impact under hypothermia and dilution. Consistently, lethal triad resulted in an additive effect of all conditions. None of the simulated conditions induced a statistically relevant change in coagulation initiation assessed by EXTEM and FIBTEM thrombelastometry. Platelet contribution to clot formation decreased gradually under the respective conditions, reaching statistical significance for simulated dilution, and attaining its greatest extent under the conditions of lethal triad (Δtrias/baseline 0.59; p = 0.01). Consistent, reduced CD62 expression levels were observed under experimental acidosis (Δacidosis/baseline 0.32; p = 0.006), dilution (Δdilution/baseline 0.34; p = 0.01) and lethal triad (Δlethal triad/baseline 0.24; p = 0.01). The respective external factors of lethal triad play a pivotal role in the development of coagulopathy, essentially influencing the kinetics of clot formation, and to a varying extent clot diameter, as measured by thrombelastometry. Moreover, impairment of platelet function under the conditions of lethal triad plays a key role in the pathophysiology of TIC, resulting in reduced responsiveness to stimulation with ADP that might also be present after trauma. Our data indicate that impairment of primary haemostasis contribute to the hypocoagulative state in TIC after trauma aggravated by external factors of lethal triad.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 18%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Other 3 5%
Other 7 12%
Unknown 17 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 43%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 20 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2020.
All research outputs
#6,838,478
of 23,100,534 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#600
of 1,267 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,526
of 330,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#18
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,100,534 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,267 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,630 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.