You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Title |
Lessons from dynamic cadaver and invasive bone pin studies: do we know how the foot really moves during gait?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, May 2009
|
DOI | 10.1186/1757-1146-2-18 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christopher J Nester |
Abstract |
This paper provides a summary of a Keynote lecture delivered at the 2009 Australasian Podiatry Conference. The aim of the paper is to review recent research that has adopted dynamic cadaver and invasive kinematics research approaches to better understand foot and ankle kinematics during gait. It is not intended to systematically cover all literature related to foot and ankle kinematics (such as research using surface mounted markers). Since the paper is based on a keynote presentation its focuses on the authors own experiences and work in the main, drawing on the work of others where appropriate |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 12 | 39% |
United States | 4 | 13% |
Spain | 3 | 10% |
Belgium | 1 | 3% |
Sweden | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 10 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 25 | 81% |
Scientists | 3 | 10% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 6% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Thailand | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 123 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 22 | 17% |
Researcher | 16 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
Other | 10 | 8% |
Other | 30 | 23% |
Unknown | 21 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 34% |
Sports and Recreations | 15 | 12% |
Engineering | 15 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 10% |
Unknown | 27 | 21% |