You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Teaser: Individualized benchmarking and optimization of read mapping results for NGS data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13059-015-0803-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Moritz Smolka, Philipp Rescheneder, Michael C. Schatz, Arndt von Haeseler, Fritz J. Sedlazeck |
| Abstract |
Mapping reads to a genome remains challenging, especially for non-model organisms with lower quality assemblies, or for organisms with higher mutation rates. While most research has focused on speeding up the mapping process, little attention has been paid to optimize the choice of mapper and parameters for a user's dataset. Here, we present Teaser, a software that assists in these choices through rapid automated benchmarking of different mappers and parameter settings for individualized data. Within minutes, Teaser completes a quantitative evaluation of an ensemble of mapping algorithms and parameters. We use Teaser to demonstrate how Bowtie2 can be optimized for different data. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 34% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Sweden | 2 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Israel | 1 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 5 | 16% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 26 | 81% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 19% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 3 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 126 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 29% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Unknown | 9 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 66 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 25% |
| Computer Science | 17 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,295,601
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#1,000
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,077
of 294,217 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#26
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 294,217 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.