↓ Skip to main content

Trans-anal irrigation therapy to treat adult chronic functional constipation: systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Gastroenterology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Trans-anal irrigation therapy to treat adult chronic functional constipation: systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
BMC Gastroenterology, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12876-015-0354-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher D. Emmett, Helen J. Close, Yan Yiannakou, James M. Mason

Abstract

Trans-anal irrigation (TAI) is used widely to treat bowel dysfunction, although evidence for its use in adult chronic functional constipation remains unclear. Long-term outcome data are lacking, and the effectiveness of therapy in this patient group is not definitively known. Evidence for effectiveness and safety was reviewed and the quality of studies was assessed. Primary research articles of patients with chronic functional constipation, treated with TAI as outpatients and published in English in indexed journals were eligible. Searching included major bibliographical databases and search terms: bowel dysfunction, defecation, constipation and irrigation. Fixed- and random-effect meta-analyses were performed. Seven eligible uncontrolled studies, including 254 patients, of retrospective or prospective design were identified. The definition of treatment response varied and was investigator-determined. The fixed-effect pooled response rate (the proportion of patients with a positive outcome based on investigator-reported response for each study) was 50.4 % (95 % CI: 44.3-56.5 %) but featured substantial heterogeneity (I(2) = 67.1 %). A random-effects estimate was similar: 50.9 % (95 % CI: 39.4-62.3 %). Adverse events were inconsistently reported but were commonplace and minor. The reported success rate of irrigation for functional constipation is about 50 %, comparable to or better than the response seen in trials of pharmacological therapies. TAI is a safe treatment benefitting some patients with functional constipation, which is a chronic refractory condition. However findings for TAI vary, possibly due to varying methodology and context. Well-designed prospective trials are required to improve the current weak evidence base.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 11%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 23 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Engineering 2 4%
Psychology 1 2%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 25 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#7,709,030
of 23,707,131 outputs
Outputs from BMC Gastroenterology
#505
of 1,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,569
of 281,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Gastroenterology
#11
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,707,131 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,825 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 281,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.