You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Heat shock factor binding in Alu repeats expands its involvement in stress through an antisense mechanism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2011-12-11-r117 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rajesh Pandey, Amit K Mandal, Vineet Jha, Mitali Mukerji |
| Abstract |
Alu RNAs are present at elevated levels in stress conditions and, consequently, Alu repeats are increasingly being associated with the physiological stress response. Alu repeats are known to harbor transcription factor binding sites that modulate RNA pol II transcription and Alu RNAs act as transcriptional co-repressors through pol II binding in the promoter regions of heat shock responsive genes. An observation of a putative heat shock factor (HSF) binding site in Alu led us to explore whether, through HSF binding, these elements could further contribute to the heat shock response repertoire. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| India | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Belgium | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 62 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 22% |
| Researcher | 15 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 11 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 1% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 13 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2020.
All research outputs
#7,204,882
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,269
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,052
of 245,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#28
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.