Contrary to the common belief that it should be easier to publish in Nat. Commun. (due to its large APC) compared to a PRL, I realize that the overall acceptance rate of Nat. Com. is ~14% compared to ~29% of PRL. 1/2 Sources: https://t.co/NJ2V51R7PZ and h
So far, Altmetric has seen
211 X posts from 192 X users, with an upper bound of 1,832,532 followers.
579 followers
2,360 followers
@MishaTeplitskiy - implementing double anonymous peer review is onerous, so how about voluntary anonymisation? It doesn't work: those who benefit from named review don't anonymise. Nature journals saw low uptake, mainly Indian and Chinese authors: http
259 followers
RT @Marek_Kwiek: Interesting! The proportion of authors that choose double-blind review is higher when they submit to more prestigious jou…
10,622 followers
Interesting! The proportion of authors that choose double-blind review is higher when they submit to more prestigious journals, they're affiliated with less prestigious institutions; double-blind option is also linked to less successful editorial outcomes