↓ Skip to main content

The use of external electronic tags on fish: an evaluation of tag retention and tagging effects

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Biotelemetry, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
144 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of external electronic tags on fish: an evaluation of tag retention and tagging effects
Published in
Animal Biotelemetry, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s40317-015-0086-z
Authors

Niels Jepsen, Eva B. Thorstad, Torgeir Havn, Martyn C. Lucas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Unknown 232 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 20%
Researcher 42 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 16%
Student > Bachelor 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 4%
Other 25 11%
Unknown 45 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 106 45%
Environmental Science 42 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Computer Science 3 1%
Other 14 6%
Unknown 60 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2015.
All research outputs
#13,957,995
of 22,830,751 outputs
Outputs from Animal Biotelemetry
#183
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,549
of 283,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Biotelemetry
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,830,751 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.