↓ Skip to main content

Hemodynamic management of critically ill burn patients: an international survey

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, August 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
64 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hemodynamic management of critically ill burn patients: an international survey
Published in
Critical Care, August 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13054-018-2129-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sabri Soussi, Mette M. Berger, Kirsten Colpaert, Martin W. Dünser, Anne Berit Guttormsen, Nicole P. Juffermans, Paul Knape, Guniz Koksal, Athina Lavrentieva, Thomas Leclerc, José A. Lorente, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Philipp Metnitz, Olivier Pantet, Paolo Pelosi, Anne-Françoise Rousseau, Folke Sjöberg, Matthieu Legrand, for the ESICM Burn ICU working group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 15 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Linguistics 1 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 15 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,073,178
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#851
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,576
of 341,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#21
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.