↓ Skip to main content

Impact of library preparation protocols and template quantity on the metagenomic reconstruction of a mock microbial community

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
35 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
259 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Impact of library preparation protocols and template quantity on the metagenomic reconstruction of a mock microbial community
Published in
BMC Genomics, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-2063-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert M. Bowers, Alicia Clum, Hope Tice, Joanne Lim, Kanwar Singh, Doina Ciobanu, Chew Yee Ngan, Jan-Fang Cheng, Susannah G. Tringe, Tanja Woyke

Abstract

The rapid development of sequencing technologies has provided access to environments that were either once thought inhospitable to life altogether or that contain too few cells to be analyzed using genomics approaches. While 16S rRNA gene microbial community sequencing has revolutionized our understanding of community composition and diversity over time and space, it only provides a crude estimate of microbial functional and metabolic potential. Alternatively, shotgun metagenomics allows comprehensive sampling of all genetic material in an environment, without any underlying primer biases. Until recently, one of the major bottlenecks of shotgun metagenomics has been the requirement for large initial DNA template quantities during library preparation. Here, we investigate the effects of varying template concentrations across three low biomass library preparation protocols on their ability to accurately reconstruct a mock microbial community of known composition. We analyze the effects of input DNA quantity and library preparation method on library insert size, GC content, community composition, assembly quality and metagenomic binning. We found that library preparation method and the amount of starting material had significant impacts on the mock community metagenomes. In particular, GC content shifted towards more GC rich sequences at the lower input quantities regardless of library prep method, the number of low quality reads that could not be mapped to the reference genomes increased with decreasing input quantities, and the different library preparation methods had an impact on overall metagenomic community composition. This benchmark study provides recommendations for library creation of representative and minimally biased metagenome shotgun sequencing, enabling insights into functional attributes of low biomass ecosystem microbial communities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 259 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 248 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 65 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 21%
Student > Master 41 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Student > Postgraduate 13 5%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 31 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 90 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 55 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 8%
Environmental Science 19 7%
Engineering 9 3%
Other 24 9%
Unknown 40 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,979,957
of 25,126,845 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#459
of 11,167 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,061
of 290,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#12
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,126,845 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,167 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.