↓ Skip to main content

Building capacity in mental health interventions in low resource countries: an apprenticeship model for training local providers

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Mental Health Systems, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
243 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
332 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Building capacity in mental health interventions in low resource countries: an apprenticeship model for training local providers
Published in
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/1752-4458-5-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laura K Murray, Shannon Dorsey, Paul Bolton, Mark JD Jordans, Atif Rahman, Judith Bass, Helena Verdeli

Abstract

Recent global mental health research suggests that mental health interventions can be adapted for use across cultures and in low resource environments. As evidence for the feasibility and effectiveness of certain specific interventions begins to accumulate, guidelines are needed for how to train, supervise, and ideally sustain mental health treatment delivery by local providers in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). MODEL AND CASE PRESENTATIONS: This paper presents an apprenticeship model for lay counselor training and supervision in mental health treatments in LMIC, developed and used by the authors in a range of mental health intervention studies conducted over the last decade in various low-resource settings. We describe the elements of this approach, the underlying logic, and provide examples drawn from our experiences working in 12 countries, with over 100 lay counselors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 326 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 16%
Student > Master 51 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 32 10%
Other 21 6%
Other 61 18%
Unknown 67 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 98 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 54 16%
Social Sciences 37 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 8%
Neuroscience 5 2%
Other 25 8%
Unknown 87 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#1,529,360
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#59
of 759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,539
of 243,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 243,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them