You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The short international physical activity questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, validation and reliability of the Hausa language version in Nigeria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2288-11-156 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adewale L Oyeyemi, Adetoyeje Y Oyeyemi, Babatunde O Adegoke, Fatima O Oyetoke, Habeeb N Aliyu, Salamatu U Aliyu, Adamu A Rufai |
| Abstract |
Accurate assessment of physical activity is important in determining the risk for chronic diseases such as cardiovascular disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, cancer and obesity. The absence of culturally relevant measures in indigenous languages could pose challenges to epidemiological studies on physical activity in developing countries. The purpose of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Short International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF) to the Hausa language, and to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Hausa version of IPAQ-SF in Nigeria. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 216 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 10% |
| Researcher | 19 | 9% |
| Other | 40 | 18% |
| Unknown | 49 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 32% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 19 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 11% |
| Unknown | 58 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2011.
All research outputs
#15,239,825
of 22,659,164 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1,498
of 2,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,155
of 239,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,659,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,000 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.