↓ Skip to main content

Bioefficacy of long-lasting insecticidal nets against pyrethroid-resistant populations of Anopheles gambiae s.s. from different malaria transmission zones in Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, May 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bioefficacy of long-lasting insecticidal nets against pyrethroid-resistant populations of Anopheles gambiae s.s. from different malaria transmission zones in Uganda
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, May 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-6-130
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Okia, Richard Ndyomugyenyi, James Kirunda, Anatol Byaruhanga, Seraphine Adibaku, Denis K Lwamafa, Fred Kironde

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Kenya 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 100 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 17%
Student > Master 18 17%
Student > Postgraduate 5 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 18 17%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 25 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2014.
All research outputs
#7,468,281
of 22,831,537 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#1,856
of 5,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,932
of 192,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#24
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,831,537 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,465 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,886 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.