You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What is the effect of prescribed burning in temperate and boreal forest on biodiversity, beyond pyrophilous and saproxylic species? A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, August 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13750-018-0131-5 |
| Authors |
Jacqualyn Eales, Neal R. Haddaway, Claes Bernes, Steven J. Cooke, Bengt Gunnar Jonsson, Jari Kouki, Gillian Petrokofsky, Jessica J. Taylor |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 21% |
| Canada | 6 | 11% |
| United States | 3 | 6% |
| India | 2 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| South Africa | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Thailand | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 33 | 62% |
| Scientists | 16 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 27 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 22% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 3% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,156,020
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#35
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,063
of 344,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.