↓ Skip to main content

Multiple comparisons

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multiple comparisons
Published in
BMC Biology, October 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12915-015-0199-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma Saxon

Abstract

Oat plants grown at an agricultural research facility produce higher yields in Field 1 than in Field 2, under well fertilised conditions and with similar weather exposure; all oat plants in both fields are healthy and show no sign of disease. In this study, the authors hypothesised that the soil microbial community might be different in each field, and these differences might explain the difference in oat plant growth. They carried out a metagenomic analysis of the 16 s ribosomal 'signature' sequences from bacteria in 50 randomly located soil samples in each field to determine the composition of the bacterial community. The study identified >1000 species, most of which were present in both fields. The authors identified two plant growth-promoting species that were significantly reduced in soil from Field 2 (Student's t-test P < 0.05), and concluded that these species might have contributed to reduced yield.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 2 5%
Ireland 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
New Zealand 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 36 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 11 26%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 36%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Computer Science 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 7 17%